Legal Opinion

In re: Michael Lawrence Harshfield; Bert Friedman and Julie Solomon v. Michael Lawrence Harshfield

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 16, 2022No. 22-00008Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: ) ) Case No. 21 B 11947 MICHAEL LAWRENCE HARSHFIELD, ) ) Debtor. ) Chapter 7 _________________________________________ ) ) BERT FRIEDMAN and JULIE SOLOMON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Adv. 22 A 8 ) v. ) ) Judge David D. Cleary MICHAEL LAWRENCE HARSHFIELD, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Bert Friedman (“Friedman”) and Julie Solomon (“Solomon”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a four-count complaint (“Complaint”) against Michael Lawrence Harshfield (“Defendant” or “Harshfield”), seeking a finding that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Reger Development, LLC v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API