Legal Opinion
Maxwell v. Pacesetter Steel Services, Inc. (In Re Waner Corp.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 1, 1988No. 17-03056PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COMPLAINT TO AVOID ALLEGED PREFERENTIAL TRANSFERS
JACK B. SCHMETTERER, Bankruptcy Judge.
Andrew J. Maxwell (“Trustee” or “Plaintiff” ) seeks to avoid and recover two alleged prepetition transfers as preferences, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 547(b). He has moved for Summary Judgment. Paceset ter Steel Service', Inc. (“Pacesetter”) cross motioned for Summary Judgment.
This Court has core jurisdiction to enter final judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F). For reasons stated below, Trustee’s Motion for Summary Judgment is denied while…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Charles E. Egger v. Harlan C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- William Lee Howland v. William Kilquist and Gene TruittCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re WeatherspoonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Chicago City Bank & Trust Co. v. Jaffe (In Re Jaffe)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Matter of US Marketing Concepts, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990
- T.M. Sweeney & Sons, LTL Services, Inc. v. Crawford (In Re T.M. Sweeney & Sons, LTL Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Nelson Co. v. Amquip Corp. (In Re Nelson Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.