DCR, INC. v. Pierce County
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.
An adult entertainment corporation and a dancer challenge the constitutionality of a Pierce County (the County) ordinance regulating erotic dance studios. DCR, Inc., and table dancer Kathy Johnson (DCR) appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their lawsuit on the County’s *666motion for summary judgment. Finding no unconstitutional restraint on protected expressive conduct, we affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
A. The Current Ordinance
Pierce County, Wash. Ordinance 94-5 (1994), codified as Pierce County Code (PCC) 5.14 (1994) (the Ordinance), regulates erotic dance studios, managers, dancers, and employees. Its…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited49 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Detention of Henrickson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Personal Restraint of StewartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- In re the Personal Restraint of StewartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Dillon v. Seattle Deposition Reporters, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Autoliv ASP, Inc. v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.