Knight v. American Investment & Improvement Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered December 11, 1911, in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
— On the 18th day of June, 1907, the plaintiffs, as first parties and the defendants, as second parties, entered into an agreement in writing, reciting that the plaintiffs had *381brought an action, which was then pending, to foreclose two mortgages upon certain real estate which was specifically described ; that the mortgages were drawn for $15,999 and $3,-000 respectively; that other parties had brought actions affecting the defendants, the mortgagors, and the property covered by the mortgage, the pendency of which made the sale of property and the payment of the indebtedness impracticable. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fenby v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Bang v. Windmill Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Inland Trading Co. v. EdgecombeWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Lay v. BoutonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Ford v. Washington National Building & Loan Investment Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Britz v. KinsvaterArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Josevig -Kennecott Copper Co. v. James F. Howarth Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
- Richardson v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Weitzman v. BergstromWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Weitzman v. BergstromWashington Supreme Court · 1969