Legal Opinion

Franzen v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 10, 1943PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The question for decision is whether plaintiff was the wife of George Albert Eranzen at the tim.e of his death on August 6th, 1939. If so, she is entitled to the proceeds of a group insurance policy issued by defendant to the deceased’s employer, E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co., Inc. The employment commenced prior to the time of the asserted marriage; and Eranzen designated his father as the' beneficiary of the policy. The designee died on January 22d, 1939, but the insured failed to appoint a substitute beneficiary. The policy provided that, in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  2. Gibbs v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  3. Holmes v. HolmesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
  4. Succession of MarinoniSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  5. Succession of AndersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bp Chemicals Ltd. (An English Corporation) v. Formosa Chemical & Fibre Corporation (A Taiwanese Corporation) Joseph Oat Corporation (A Pennsylvania Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. In Re DamatoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  3. Simmons v. SimmonsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO v. National UnionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Jordan v. MohanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API