Legal Opinion

Succession of Marinoni

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 27, 1935No. 33013PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ODOM, Justice.

This is plaintiff’s second suit to gain possession of a one-third interest in the succession of Ulisse Marinoni, Jr., who died testate in New Orleans on September 12, 1931. In her first suit she alleged that her mother and said Marinoni contracted a “common law marriage” in the state of Mississippi on August 25, 1900; that such marriages, although not clothed with a formal ceremony, were recognized as valid under the laws of Mississippi and produced all the civil effects of a ceremonial marriage; that she was born of that marriage and was her father’s only child and heir; that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Succession of MarinoniSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Brooks v. MageeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  3. McCaffrey v. BensonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
  4. Pfister v. St. Bernard Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  5. Hinrichs v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Funderburk v. FunderburkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Succession of PiggSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  3. Adkins' Heirs v. Crawford, Jenkins & Booth, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  4. Franzen v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  5. Maher v. City of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1974

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API