Christensen v. Lambert
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On application for a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fort, J.
This is an application for a rule to show eause why a new trial should not be granted, made at bar, after the refusal to grant the same by the justice at Circuit.
This is the second trial. A previous verdict for a much larger amount was set aside by this court. Christensen v. Lambert, 47 Atl. Rep. 1132.
The application is put upon two grounds. First, that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. The evidence in this case now before the court is about the same as that before this court and determined in the case above referred to, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- West Chicago Street Railroad v. AnnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Golder v. LundNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Grace v. McArthurWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Whitaker v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- Murray v. Mayor of BayonneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
- Coward v. Mayor of BayonneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Milner v. City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- Middle Valley Trap Rock & Mining Co. v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
- Suburban Land & Improvement Co. v. Mayor of VailsburgSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.