Legal Opinion

Golder v. Lund

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1897No. 7110PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from the district court of Dodge county. Tried below before Marshall, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

Lund sued Golder for assault and battery. The defenses interposed were a denial of the assault, self-*868defense, and certain averments by way of mitigation of damages. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $1,500, which the defendant seeks to reverse.

Certain assignments of error are waived in the brief. Of those insisted upon, two relate to the admission of evidence with regard to the expenses of medical attendance in the treatment of plaintiff for the injuries alleged to have been inflicted upon him. The plaintiff, after narrating the circumstances and consequences of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carleton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gran v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hewitt v. EisenbartNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Williams v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  5. City of Friend v. IngersollNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cain v. SkillinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Chaperon v. Portland Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Chas. T. Derr Construction Co. v. GelruthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Thoren v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  5. McCormick v. SchtrenckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API