Armco, Inc. v. Cyclops Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Armco, Inc. (Armco) appeals from the Memorandum and Order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, 1 granting ap-pellee Cyclops Corporation’s (Cyclops) motion for summary judgment and holding that Armco’s United States Patent No. 3,556,776 (’776 patent) 2 was invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) because the subject matter of the patent was on sale or in public use more than one year prior to the patent’s effective filing date. 3 We reverse and remand because with respect to the section 102(b) issue a trial is necessary for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- P.M. Palumbo v. Don-Joy Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Alfred Cooper v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Opryland USA Inc. v. The Great American Music Show, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Lima Surgical Associates, Inc., Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association Plan Trust, Huntington National Bank, Trustee v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- American Airlines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. Releasomers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.