Legal Opinion
Seider v. Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 23, 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.
[¶ 1] Judith Seider appeals from the judgment entered in the Administrative Court (Beaudoin, C.J.) affirming the decision and order of the Board of Examiners of Psychologists finding that she had violated four provisions of the Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct of Psychologists of the American Psychological Association 1 (EPCC) and that those violations constituted negligence pursuant to 32 M.R.S.A. § 3887(8). 2 On appeal, Seider argues (1) the Board was required to introduce expert testimony to establish the governing standards of care, and that its failure to do so violated her due…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cyr v. GiesenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Searles v. Trustees of St. Joseph's CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Ansell v. Department of Commerce (On Remand)Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Fichter v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Montany v. University of New EnglandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Hopkins v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. Executive DirectorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- John Doe v. Maine Board of Osteopathic LicensureSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- DaimlerChrysler v. EXEC. DIR., REV. SERVS.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.