Legal Opinion
John Doe v. Maine Board of Osteopathic Licensure
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 17, 2020PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision:
2020 ME 134
Docket: Ken-20-32 Argued October 6, 2020 Decided: November 17, 2020 Panel: MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. JOHN DOE1 v. BOARD OF OSTEOPATHIC LICENSURE CONNORS, J. [¶1] John Doe, DO, filed a three-count complaint against the Maine Board of Osteopathic Licensure. Two counts seek a declaration pursuant to the Maine Declaratory Judgments Act, 14 M.R.S. §§ 5951-5963 (2020), that pending disciplinary complaints against him must be dismissed because the Board did not provide him the sixty-day notice…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Corinth Pellets, LLC v. Arch Specialty Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
- Chris Calnan v. Sam HurleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
- Roque Island Gardner Homestead Corporation v. Town of JonesportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021