Legal Opinion
Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. Executive Director
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 22, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSilver, J.
[¶ 1] DaimlerChrysler Corporation appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Marden, J.) affirming a decision of the Acting Executive Director of the Maine Revenue Service denying DCC’s request for a sales tax refund. DCC contends that it is entitled to a refund pursuant to 36 M.R.S. § 2011 (2006), and that MRS’s interpretation of section 2011 raises multiple constitutional infirmities when applied in conjunction with the Maine Lemon Law, 10 M.R.S. §§ 1161-1169 (2006). We determine that DCC is not entitled to a refund pursuant to 36 M.R.S. § 2011. We further…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Vail v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- CRY v. CoteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. LawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- John Doe XLVI v. Stephanie AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- Pat Doe v. Christopher Hills-PettittSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- DaimlerChrysler v. EXEC. DIR., REV. SERVS.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007