Whatley v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
This appeal of appellants, E. L. Whatley and wife, plaintiffs below, from a judgment which denied them a recovery, is predicated upon alleged misconduct of the jury, in that they obtained and consulted a Webster’s Revised Dictionary and used same in determining the meaning and definition of the words “preponderance” and “proximate cause” while deliberating upon and in answering the special issues which contained these terms. The jury answered that certain negligent acts of defendant. W. G. Davis and of defendant Plorace Collins each were a proximate cause of the injuries,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Holmes v. CoalsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- City of Henderson v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. EthridgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Davidson v. CrockettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Murray v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Murray v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961