Legal Opinion

Murray v. Murray

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 16, 1961No. 15788Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing

Appellee in his motion for rehearing charges that we erred in considering and sustaining appellant’s thirteenth point for the reason that (1) appellant filed no bill of exceptions complaining of the trial court’s failure to make findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (2) appellant failed to call the attention of the trial judge to his omission to make findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Rule 297, T.R.C.P.

In support of the first of the above points appellee cites us to the cases of Steppe v. O’Day, Tex.Civ.App., 315 S.W.2d 599, 603; Smith v. Vankirk,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spradlin v. Rosebud Feed & Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Steppe v. O'DAYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Tucker v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Gunst v. Dallas Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Smith v. VankirkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API