Legal Opinion

State v. Foutch

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ms. Chief Justice Gseeh

delivered the opinion of the Court.

An indictment was returned against defendant Lillard Foutch in which it was charged that he unlawfully did permit the selling and dispensing of poisons, to-wit, tincture of iodine, in his Pharmacy or retail drug store, hy an unlicensed person and without the presence of and under the immediate personal supervision of a pharmacist or assistant pharmacist.

An indictment was returned against defendant Burnell Lester in which it was charged that he did unlawfully prepare, or dispense or sell a certain poison, to-wit, tincture of iodine, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Highway Department v. Montgomery Mitchell's HeirsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  2. State Board of Pharmacy v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. State ex rel. Grantham v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State ex rel. Davis v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. North Carolina Board of Pharmacy v. LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Prins v. Michigan State PoliceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. StephensMontana Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API