Legal Opinion

Steele v. Thatcher

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1870PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. William A. Porter, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheldon

This was a suit upon an injunction bond, wherein a verdict was found and judgment rendered against the appellants for $350 in the court below.

The condition of the bond was in the following words: “ How, therefore, if the above bounden Harriet Steele shall well and truly pay all costs that may be adjudged against her on the dissolution of said injunction, together with all such damages as the said David C. Thatcher et al., or either of them, may sustain, or which may be assessed and awarded by the court, by reason of the issuing of said injunction, in case the same shall be dissolved, then,”…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wittich v. O'NealSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  2. Underhill v. SpencerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Oklahoma Cotton Growers Ass'n v. GroffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Iliff v. School DirectorsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  5. Panton v. CollarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API