Legal Opinion

Well v. . Flowers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action is brought to recover the personal property specified in the complaint, the plaintiffs availing themselves of the provisional remedy of claim and delivery. The plaintiffs allege their title to and right to have possession of the property particularly specified. The defendant, in his answer, denies the material allegations of the complaint. The court submitted, among others, this issue: "1. Are the plaintiffs owners of the property in dispute, or any part thereof?" to which the jury responded, "No."

On the trial the plaintiffs put in evidence a paper-writing, whereof the following…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woodlief v. . Harris and ParhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Rountree v. . Britt and VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. Rawlings v. . HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. State v. . LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. Hurley v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Community State Bank v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Shomaker v. WatersSupreme Court of Florida · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API