Shomaker v. Waters
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was decided by Division A. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Jackson Oounity. j The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCockrell, J.
The plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs, sued the defendants in error, as defendants, for the value of three bales of cotton, which it was claimed were covered by a mortgage crop lien given the plaintiff by one Adams.
Upon the trial the court rejected the mortgage upon objection interposed that it did not sufficiently describe the property alleged to have been bought, and that there *560was a variance between the mortgage offered and that described in the declaration. As to the latter point we can find no variance and the defendant has not insisted upon the point here. The mortgage opens “State of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ellis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Wasson v. ConnorMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
- Smith v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Johnson v. GrissardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
- Connally v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nat'l. Bank of Panama v. Nat'l. Bank of ChipleySupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Palatka Abstract & Title Guarantee Co. v. HaskellSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Tippins v. Belle Mead Dev. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Weber v. Belle Mead Dev. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933