United States v. Thirty Eight (38) Golden Eagles or Eagle Parts
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDWARD C. REED, Jr., Chief Judge.
This is a forfeiture action which comes to this Court by way of a Report and Recommendation made by the United States Magistrate regarding the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. In that Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate indicates that summary judgment for the plaintiff should be granted, and that these defendant eagles and eagle parts should be forfeited to the plaintiff. A brief review of the facts leading up to the present posture of this case is appropriate.
In January of 1982, the claimant, Adam Norwall, sold or exchanged two full golden…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. HardmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. FridayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Frank A. Hugs, United States of America v. William E. HugsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Leonard Fridall Terry AntoineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Havasupai Tribe v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.