Legal Opinion
Havasupai Tribe v. United States
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 18, 1990No. Civ. 88-971 PHX-RGSPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STRAND, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, the Havasupai Tribe and individual members of the Tribe, seek judicial review of the final decision by the Chief of the Forest Service to approve a modified Plan of Operations (the “Plan”) submitted by co-defendant Energy Fuels Nuclear, Inc. in October 1984, for the Canyon Uranium Mine located in the Kaibab National Forest near the Grand Canyon National Park. Defendants in this action are: the United States of America, The Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; the Secretary of Agriculture; Chief of the Forest Service; the Regional…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Havasupai Tribe v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Havasupai Tribe v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- National Mining Association v. Ryan ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Havasupai Tribe v. Heather ProvencioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.