Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Fant v. Mengel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1991No. 91-1059PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Before mandamus can issue, relator must establish he has a clear legal right to the relief requested. State, ex rel. Fant, v. Sykes (1986), 28 Ohio St.3d 90, 28 OBR 185, 502 N.E.2d 597. The Public Records Act, R.C. 149.43, does not require that a public office create new documents to meet a requester’s demand. State, ex rel. Scanlon, v. Deters (1989), 45 Ohio St.3d 376, 544 N.E.2d 680. Accordingly, the court of appeals correctly granted appellees’ motion for summary judgment.

The court of appeals also correctly denied appellant’s motion to assess costs since the complaint lacked any merit.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Scanlon v. DetersOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Fant v. SykesOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Fant v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Nix v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Wilson-Simmons v. Lake County Sheriff's DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API