Legal Opinion

Fant v. Board of Trustees

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1990No. 89-1755PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reason stated by that court in its journal entry: “R.C. 149.43(C) authorizes only ‘attorney fees,’ not compensation to pro se litigants.”

Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., not participating.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Fant v. MengelOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Ingraham v. RibarOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Ware v. GalonskiOhio Supreme Court · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API