Claughton v. Leavenworth

This is the second appearance of this case, the first being reported in 197 Miss. 606, 19 So. (2d) 815, 20 So. (2d) 821. In that appeal, as seen from the opinion, it appeared that, upon the face of the record itself, there were two separate sales of continguous tracts assessed to the same owner, and, as a consequence, the sales were void under the statutes as they existed at the time of the sales.

When tile case reached the trial court on the remand, the reformed pleadings and the evidence then taken, as appears from the present record, were such as to show that the numbers 217 and 218, which…