Legal Opinion

Leavenworth v. Claughton

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1944No. 35718PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant, Leavenworth, was the owner in fee simple of the land hereinafter described and remains such owner unless his title was lost by the tax sales here in question. On the assessment roll for the year 1930 there was assessed to appellant as owner, and on line 11 of the page covering Secs. 6 and 7, Tp. 1, N.R. 13, the lands as follows: S. 1/2 of S.W. 1/4 N.W. 1/4 of S.E. I/4 S. 1/2 of S.E. 1/4 Sec. 6, Tp. 1, N.R. 13, assessed valuation $1,000.

And on line 22 of the page, the land of appellant in Sec. 7 was separately assessed as follows: All except N.E. I/4 of N.W. 1/4 Sec. 7, Tp. 1, N.R.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russell v. PhelpsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Dingey v. PaxtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Grant v. MontgomeryMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Cox v. RichersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Wilkerson v. HarringtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Neal v. TeatMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. TuckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
  3. Slush v. PattersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1947
  4. BROADUS v. HickmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Pittman v. CurrieMississippi Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API