Bateman v. Doughnut Corp. of America
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $25,000 and from an order denying a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Appellant directs his appeal solely to the fact that certain requested instructions were not given and that error was committed in receiving in evidence a photograph of the scene of the accident, taken after certain changes were made.
The facts of the case may be summarized as follows: Upphoff entered into a contract on January 21, 1941, with the Doughnut Corporation of America, respondent’s employer, to install a hydro-electric freight elevator in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kalash v. Los Angeles Ladder Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Sheward v. VirtueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Helling v. SchindlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Swaney v. Peden Steel CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Pierson v. Holly Sugar Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Shipley v. City of Arroyo GrandeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Barone v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.