Legal Opinion

Bateman v. Doughnut Corp. of America

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1944No. Civ. 12588PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $25,000 and from an order denying a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Appellant directs his appeal solely to the fact that certain requested instructions were not given and that error was committed in receiving in evidence a photograph of the scene of the accident, taken after certain changes were made.

The facts of the case may be summarized as follows: Upphoff entered into a contract on January 21, 1941, with the Doughnut Corporation of America, respondent’s employer, to install a hydro-electric freight elevator in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Kalash v. Los Angeles Ladder Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Sheward v. VirtueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Helling v. SchindlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Swaney v. Peden Steel CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Pierson v. Holly Sugar Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Shipley v. City of Arroyo GrandeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Barone v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API