Garfield Aniline Works, Inc. v. Zendle

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict which was reduced by the trial judge to. conform to what he thought was the obvious intention of the jury.

*538Abraham Zendle, who was plaintiff below, was an employee of the defendant company, whieh is the appellant here. Speaking of the parties as they appeared below, the defendant was engaged in manufacturing dye stuffs and colors. It entered into an agreement with Zendle in November, 1919, providing that in addition to his stipulated weekly salary, he was to receive commissions ranging from 1 to 10 cents per pound…