Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. McManama

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 23, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Motion to amend the writ in this action of contract by changing its date from September 2, 1931, to August 3, 1931, was denied by the trial judge for the sole reason that he had no power to allow it.

These facts are set out in the bill of exceptions: The defendants were appointed executors of the testator on August 21,1930. The plaintiff sued out a writ against them on August 3, 1931, and caused an attachment of real estate in Plymouth County to be made on August 13, 1931. Later it was discovered that that attachment was void. Instead of using the same writ for service upon the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pizer v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Shapiro v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Johnson v. CarrollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Pierce v. TiernanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Hamilton v. IngrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Regan v. Atlantic Refining Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Louisville N. R. Co. v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  3. Parker v. RichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Byron v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1934
  5. B. M. C. Durfee Trust Co. v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API