Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Tiernan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 12, 1932PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
Each of the plaintiffs in these actions of tort seeks to recover compensation for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of the collision of the automobile in which the plaintiff was a passenger with an automobile negligently operated by the defendant. The statute of limitations was pleaded among other defences. In each action the injuries were sustained on October 8, 1928; the writ was dated October 8, 1929, was returnable on the first Monday of January, 1930, was placed in the hands of the officer for service on December 4, 1929, was served on December 10, 1929, and was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carroll v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Thomes v. Meyer Store Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Bemis v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- International Paper Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Rosenblatt v. FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Epstein v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Poy v. BoutselisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Regan v. Atlantic Refining Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Parker v. RichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Jefferson v. L'HeureuxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.