Legal Opinion
Parker v. Rich
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 30, 1937PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of contract to recover charges for services rendered to the defendant’s intestate with respect to the funeral of his wife. The case was submitted on these agreed facts: On December 21, 1934, the defendant was appointed administrator of the estate of the deceased and gave bond as required by law; on December 19, 1935, the writ in the present case was made out; on December 20, 1935, a notice was filed in the registry of probate under St. 1933, c. 221, § 4, setting forth the pend-ency of this action in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston and stating the name of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Paper Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Rosenblatt v. FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Estes v. TowerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Pierce v. TiernanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- O'Brien v. McManamaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chandler v. DunlopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Regan v. Atlantic Refining Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Margaret Marshall v. George J. MulreninCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- New England Trust Co. v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.