Legal Opinion

Hixon v. State Compensation Fund

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 22, 1977No. 2 CA-CIV 2284PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHMOND, Judge.

This is an appeal from dismissal of a complaint alleging intentional infliction of mental and emotional distress by two State Compensation Fund employees in conspiring to terminate improperly appellant’s workmen’s compensation benefits. We affirm. The court lacked jurisdiction to review the termination of benefits, and the complaint failed to state a claim for intentional infliction of mental and emotional distress upon which relief could be granted.

The complaint alleged that appellant’s benefits were wrongfully terminated when the State Compensation Fund issued a notice of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cluff v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Bendalin v. Valley National Bank of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. McMurray v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Vinson v. Linn-Mar Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Robertson v. Travelers Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. DeNardo v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Sandoval v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  5. Gallagher v. Bituminous Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API