Legal Opinion

McMurray v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 3, 1976No. 1 CA-IC 1316PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Chief Judge,

Division 1.

On this review of an award entered by the respondent Commission in a hearing concerning a claim for workmen’s compensation benefits, the petitioner contends that the Commission lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. The petitioner further contends that, if we assume that the Commission had jurisdiction, the Commission’s award which found that petitioner had not sustained any permanent disability as a result of his industrial injury, was contrary to the medical evidence.

THE JURISDICTIONAL ISSUE

Petitioner’s jurisdictional contention arises out of three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Best v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Young v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. O'DONNELL v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Castillo v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sandoval v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Hixon v. State Compensation FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Arizona Public Service Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Radlein v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API