Legal Opinion

Valentine v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1936No. Civ. 10570PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff sued to recover the proceeds of an insurance policy issued on the life of her husband. The action was tried before a jury; verdict was rendered in plaintiff’s favor for the full amount of the policy, and judgment entered thereon against defendant. Defendant appeals from the judgment.

It was alleged by plaintiff that her husband disappeared in 1924, and proof of death was predicated upon the presumption prescribed by subdivision 2'6 of section 1963 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides: “That a person not heard from in seven years is dead.” Defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Adkins v. BrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hirshfeld v. DanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Scarborough v. UrgoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Valente v. Sierra Ry. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Mercado v. HoeflerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Rossi v. ZappaterraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Napoleon Pictures Ltd. v. Fox Searchlight Pictures CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API