United States v. Robert Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Jury selection in this case was conducted by a magistrate, rather than a district judge. Accordingly, the conviction is REVERSED. Gomez v. United States, 490 U.S. 858, 109 S.Ct. 2237, 104 L.Ed.2d 923 (1989); United States v. France, 886 F.2d 223 (9th Cir.1989), affirmed without opinion by an equally divided Court, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 805, 112 L.Ed.2d 836 (1991) (per curiam). Our previous opinion in this case, United States v. Martinez, 883 F.2d 750 (9th Cir.1989), is vacated.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Robert MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Darlina K. FranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. FranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
3Cited by81 opinions
- People v. HinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- John Chang v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Charles D. Lema v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- James Brown v. Christopher ArtuzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.