Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Martinez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1991No. 87-1094PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Jury selection in this case was conducted by a magistrate, rather than a district judge. Accordingly, the conviction is REVERSED. Gomez v. United States, 490 U.S. 858, 109 S.Ct. 2237, 104 L.Ed.2d 923 (1989); United States v. France, 886 F.2d 223 (9th Cir.1989), affirmed without opinion by an equally divided Court, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 805, 112 L.Ed.2d 836 (1991) (per curiam). Our previous opinion in this case, United States v. Martinez, 883 F.2d 750 (9th Cir.1989), is vacated.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. Robert MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Darlina K. FranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. FranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. People v. HinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. John Chang v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Charles D. Lema v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. James Brown v. Christopher ArtuzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API