Legal Opinion
Bigay v. Garvey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 12, 1998No. C9-96-1033PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
On June 2,1994, plaintiff Shari Bigay initiated a medical malpractice action for negligent care and treatment against Dr. Timothy Garvey, Dr. Gary Banks, and the Regents of the University of Minnesota, d/b/a the University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinic (UMHC). Bigay’s complaint alleged that she sustained injuries during spinal fusion surgery performed at UMHC on June 3, 1992. Bigay later sought to amend her original complaint to add a negligent nondisclosure claim. The defendants argued that the amended complaint did not relate back to the original complaint as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Judith Moore v. Roy Baker Neurological Institute of Savannah, P.C. And Memorial Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Estrada v. JaquesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Plutshack Ex Rel. Plutshack v. University of Minnesota HospitalsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Jolly v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Swenson v. Emerson Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wagner v. Georgetown University Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Becker v. Mayo FoundationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Hartley v. DombrowskiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn ParkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Shea v. EsenstenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.