Legal Opinion

State v. Otto

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 26, 2017No. A15-1454PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LILLEHAUG, Justice.

Appellant Travis Richard- Otto was sentenced to 135 months in prison for first-degree possession of methamphetamine, Minn. Stat. § 152.021, subd. 2(a)(1) (2014). While his case was on appeal, the Drug Sentencing Reform Act (DSRA) took effect. See Act of May 22, 2016, ch. 160, 2016 Minn. Laws 576. The DSRA reduced the presumptive sentencing' range under the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines drug offender sentencing grid, and increased the controlled substance weight threshold for Otto’s crime'. Otto asks that we either reverse his conviction or vacate his sentence and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. State v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Edstrom v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State v. KirbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ScovelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. State v. KirbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Luna-Pliego v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. State of Minnesota v. Amanda Lee JensrudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API