State v. Otto
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LILLEHAUG, Justice.
Appellant Travis Richard- Otto was sentenced to 135 months in prison for first-degree possession of methamphetamine, Minn. Stat. § 152.021, subd. 2(a)(1) (2014). While his case was on appeal, the Drug Sentencing Reform Act (DSRA) took effect. See Act of May 22, 2016, ch. 160, 2016 Minn. Laws 576. The DSRA reduced the presumptive sentencing' range under the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines drug offender sentencing grid, and increased the controlled substance weight threshold for Otto’s crime'. Otto asks that we either reverse his conviction or vacate his sentence and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- State v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Edstrom v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ScovelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Luna-Pliego v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Amanda Lee JensrudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024