Levine v. New York State Liquor Authority
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. On the original argument of this appeal various documents submitted to the Authority subsequent to its determination were relied upon by petitioner-appellant. The Authority explains that the shortness of time in which the appeal was brought on prevented it from taking the necessary action to prevent consideration of the improperly included matter. Reliance on these documents was not proper, since a court’s review of administrative action is limited to the record made before the Authority. Nevertheless, when the material not before the Authority at the time of decision is…
2Cited by41 opinions
- Kaur v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Fanelli v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Goldstein v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Robert E. Kurzius, Inc. v. Incorporated Village of Upper BrookvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Celestial Food Corp. of Coram, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.