Legal Opinion

Constant Compliance, Inc. v. Emerson Process Management Power & Water Solutions, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 13, 2009No. Case 08 CV 3724Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MARTIN C. ASHMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff, Constant Compliance, Inc. (“Plaintiff’), has sued Hach Company (“Hach”) and Emerson Process Management Power & Water Solutions, Inc. (“Emerson”) (collectively “Defendants”). Hach is no longer a party to this case. Currently before this Court is Plaintiffs “Motion to (1) Bar Emerson From Proposing the Construction for Any Term and (2) For the Adoption of [Plaintiffs] Proposed Constructions” (“Plaintiffs Motion” or “Motion”). (Pl.’s Mot to Bar 1.) This Court rules on this Motion under Judge Wayne R.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc., Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research and Engineering Co. v. Lubrizol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. Verizon Services Corp. v. Vonage Holdings Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  4. Praxair, Inc. v. Atmi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Brian W. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API