Succession of Prescott
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
This suit was instituted by plaintiffs against their two sisters and three brothers. Defend ants 'filed, an exception of no cause of action, whibh was sustained and plaintiffs’ suit dismissed. From the judgment, plaintiffs prosecute the present appeal.
Plaintiffs’ petition and prayer are extremely lengthy. Briéfly stated, the allegations thereof and the relief demanded are as follows, viz.: •
That in the-year 1902 Mrs. Lucy O. Prescott delivered to' her .son, Lewis D. Prescott, to be held, invested, and administered by him as Her agent and for her account, the sum of $4,000. ■ That Lewis D.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eberle v. EberleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Hodge v. HodgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- George v. CampbellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874
3Cited by9 opinions
- Little v. HaikSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
- Ceromi v. HarrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Stricker v. MorganDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1958
- Carter v. LoeberSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Fontenot v. FontenotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.