Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Boyd

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 6, 2001No. 1990740PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lee Boyd was indicted for felony driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of § 32-5A-191(h), Ala. Code 1975. Two of the three prior convictions relied upon by the State to indict Boyd were more than five years old. Boyd filed a motion to dismiss the indictment, arguing that Act No. 97-556, 1997 Ala. Acts 985, unconstitutionally removed the phrase "within a five-year period" from § 32-5A-191(h). The circuit court found that Act No. 97-556 does not violate Ala. Const. 1901, §45. Therefore, the court denied Boyd's motion to dismiss, and he pled guilty, reserving the right to appeal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  2. Bagby Elevator and Electric Company, Inc. v. McBrideSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Knight v. West Alabama Environmental Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. Dunn Const. Co. v. State Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Wilkins v. WoolfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McInnish v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Ex parte D.W.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. WATER AND SEWER COM'RS OF MOBILE v. HunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Hankins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Ex parte StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API