Ex Parte Boyd
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Lee Boyd was indicted for felony driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of § 32-5A-191(h), Ala. Code 1975. Two of the three prior convictions relied upon by the State to indict Boyd were more than five years old. Boyd filed a motion to dismiss the indictment, arguing that Act No. 97-556, 1997 Ala. Acts 985, unconstitutionally removed the phrase "within a five-year period" from § 32-5A-191(h). The circuit court found that Act No. 97-556 does not violate Ala. Const. 1901, §45. Therefore, the court denied Boyd's motion to dismiss, and he pled guilty, reserving the right to appeal…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Bagby Elevator and Electric Company, Inc. v. McBrideSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Knight v. West Alabama Environmental Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Dunn Const. Co. v. State Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Wilkins v. WoolfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- McInnish v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Ex parte D.W.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- WATER AND SEWER COM'RS OF MOBILE v. HunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Hankins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Ex parte StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.