Legal Opinion
Dunn Const. Co. v. State Board of Adjustment
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 17, 1937No. 3 Div. 216PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
Appellant, Dunn Construction Company, Inc., instituted proceeding in the Montgomery circuit court for mandamus directed to the State Board of Adjustment, created by Act of September 14, 1935, Gen. Acts 1935, p. 1164.
From a judgment denying the petition, this appeal is prosecuted.
The case made by the record is this:
Appellant in 1934 entered into a contract with the State Highway Commission for the construction of a state highway project in Sumter county.
After full performance on the part of the contractor, a claim was presented to the State Highway Commission for alleged…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Railroad Company v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Ex parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Wallace v. BallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- First Nat. Bank of Scottsboro v. Jackson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Parden v. Terminal Railway of Alabama State Docks DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bobby Williams v. Larry BennettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Harbert International, Inc. v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Liberty Nat. v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.