Legal Opinion

Gehringer v. Erie Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1930No. Appeal, 35PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

The injuries for which appellant seeks recovery in this action were sustained in a somewhat unusual Avay. The trial judge concluding that plaintiff had been contributorily negligent entered a compulsory nonsuit, which the court in banc declined to remove.

Appellant at the time of the accident, on October 5, 1925, was about tAventy years of age. He and five com panions of about the same years had been lunching shortly before midnight at a restaurant on State Street, the principal highway of the City of Erie. It was a clear night. Two automobiles belonging to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Leslie v. CatanzaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Bloom v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Post v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Donahue v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  5. Brown v. FrenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dopler v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Miller v. Southern Asphalt Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Myers v. RubinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Ferencz v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Peterson v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API