Legal Opinion
Slimfold Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Kinkead Industries, Inc. And United States Gypsum Company, Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 21, 1987No. Appeal 86-830PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Kinkead Industries, Inc. and United States Gypsum Co. (together “Kinkead” herein) appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern Dis trict of Georgia, Atlanta Division 1 denying Kinkead’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of claims 1 through 3 of Patent No. Re. 31,553 (“the Ford reissue”) owned by Slimfold Manufacturing Company, Inc. (“Slimfold”). Appeal was taken pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), by order of the district court dated December 24, 1985 and petition to this court granted on January 15, 1986. We affirm.
Backgroun…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Scimed Life Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Vivid Technologies, Inc. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Multiform Desiccants, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Medzam, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.