Bennett v. Seibert
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Marion Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtGavin, C. J.
By virtue of a city ordinance, certain improvements were made in the city of Indianapolis, the expense of which was assessed against the property owners. Deloss Root, appellant’s intestate, appealed 'from the precept to collect an assessment against his realty, his right of appeal being based on section 3165, R. S. 1881.
The first question with which we are confronted arises upon the cross-error assigned.
It is contended by appellee that the appeal should have been dismissed by the circuit court for want of a bond.
Within the proper time an appeal bond was filed, which was, however, payable to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Trustees of Watertown v. Cowen & BaggNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
- City of Indianapolis v. KingsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Abbott v. Inhabitants of Cottage CityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Baker v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Abbott v. MillsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1831
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Supreme Tent v. VolkertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Golf View Realty Co. v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- Reynard v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Harris v. MillegeIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Patterson v. Town of Fort BranchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.