Legal Opinion

Reynard v. City of Caldwell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1935No. 6119PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

Appellant, for himself and others similarly situated who might join in the proceedings, as purchaser and owner of bonds of Local Improvement District numbers 2 and 4 of the City of Caldwell, seeks to compel a reassessment by the City of Caldwell and its officials against the privately owned property in the districts to cover an insufficiency, namely: the balances unpaid, together with interest, originally assessed against the Boise Valley Traction Company, the Caldwell Traction Company, and certain real property of the City of Caldwell, basing his claim to right for reassessment on the ground…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. City of New Haven v. Fair Haven & Westville RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  2. West Chicago Park Commissioners v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Kuehner v. City of FreeportIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Appeal of North Beach & Mission RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Oregon Short Line Railroad v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. CoffeeIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Territory of Hawaii Ex Rel. Sharpless v. ArnesonHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. VentlingWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Texas v. Wildish Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Municipal Investors Assn. v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API