Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 1933No. Appeal 23PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Samuel Smith was convicted under an indictment charging him, substantially in the language of Section 93 of the Act of March 31,1860, P. L. 382,18 PS §2263, with having committed an assault and battery upon Ada Wise with intent to have unlawful carnal knowledge of her, forcibly and against her will, and now appeals from the sentence imposed upon him.

So far as the indictment, itself, is concerned, any one of three verdicts was possible — acquittal, guilty of simple assault and battery or guilty as indicted.

This background is disclosed by uncontroverted evidence:…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth of Pa. v. KretezitisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JaynesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Commonwealth v. ShrodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Commonwealth v. MollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Commonwealth v. TuckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Commonwealth v. MorganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API