Commonwealth v. Morgan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Dithrich, J.,
Defendant, a practicing physician, was convicted of raping a woman patient in his office. From refusal of his motion for a new trial and the imposition of sentence, he has brought this appeal. The assignments of error are numerous, but the chief burden of his argument is that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the credible evidence. While parts of the testimony of the prosecutrix may upon review appear to be rather farfetched, on final analysis the reasonableness of her testimony was for the jury and, as opposed to the testimony of defendant, we cannot…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LuccittiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Commonwealth v. EarnestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. BerklowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Com. v. WoloszchukSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Commonwealth of Pa. v. MoranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. BorakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Commonwealth v. BauderLehigh County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1958