Commonwealth of Pa. v. Kretezitis
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrig®, J.,
The defendant was found guilty of aissault :and battery with intent to rape.
In this appeal he contends that, accepting the evidence of the Commonwealth to be true, it was insufficient to establish any intent other than to persuade Mrs. Colan to have sexual intercourse with him. Our views are not in accord with that argument. The testimony upon the part of the Commonwealth was that Mrs. Colan was employed as a waitress in the defendant’s restaurant. She was in the dining room between 4 and 5 o’clock in the afternoon of August 3, 1932, and defendant called her into the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CyausSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Lippincott v. Warren Apartment Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AllabaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth v. EbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. OylerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Commonwealth v. JacksonDauphin County Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1952