Legal Opinion

Cleary Petroleum, Inc. v. Copenhaver

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 27, 1970No. 42372PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McINERNEY, Justice.

This appeal is from a jury verdict awarding damages to the Plaintiff-cattle rancher against the Defendant-oil company for injuries sustained by Plaintiff’s cattle as a result of drinking water polluted ultimately by Defendant’s waterflood project.

The Plaintiff and a neighbor both testified to having tasted the creek during the period involved, and to finding it “very” or “real” salty. No eyewitness actually saw any of Plaintiff’s cattle drink the creek water; however, Plaintiff and other witnesses testified to observing fresh tracks and dung along the creek at the time in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Prest-O-Lite Co., Inc. v. HowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Tidal Oil Co. v. PeaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. LehmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BartmessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Johnson Oil Refining Co. v. CarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Esaw v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Sligar v. BartlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Lindauer v. LDB Drainlaying, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Sligar v. BartlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API