Legal Opinion
Hawley v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 19, 1943No. Civ. 12433PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff sued to recover sales taxes and use taxes paid under protest. The court gave judgment ' for plaintiff for the use tax and for defendant on the sales tax, and an appeal is here presented by each party as to the portion of the judgment unfavorable to that party. The two appeals present distinct questions and will be separately-dealt with.
Plaintiff’s Appeal.
Plaintiff was engaged in the retail sale of automobiles. When a used car was turned in to plaintiff as part payment on a new automobile the sales invoice or contract showed the sale price of the new automobile,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Novicki v. Department of FinanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
- Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Standard Oil Co. v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wallace Berrie & Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Southern California Edison Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- McConville v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Associated Beverage Co. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Burroughs Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.