Legal Opinion

Jacquay v. Hartzell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1891No. 161PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.

John R. Hartzell sued Lemuel Jacquay for wilfully and maliciously killing a dog owned by the plaintiff.

The complaint charges that the dog was of a peculiarly valuable breed, and was trained to habits of usefulness, and while he was upon the plaintiff’s premises, peaceably and quietly, the defendant enticed him out upon a public highway and there unlawfully and maliciously shot and killed him.

The defendant answered by general denial, and the cause was tried by a jury, and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for one hundred and fifty dollars.

The jury answered five interrogatories submitted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. McAnnallyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. City of Evansville v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. American White Bronze Co. v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Dinwiddie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Jones v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lachenman v. SticeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Smith v. CostelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Indianapolis Abattoir Co. v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Hadley v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Shaffer v. Milwaukee Mechanics' InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API